3. Managing Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest are a reality
Defining a conflict of interest
The OECD Guidelines on Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service (2003) distinguish between three types of conflict of interest:
- An actual conflict of interest involves a conflict between the public duty and private interests of a public official, in which the public official has private interests which could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities.
- An apparent conflict of interest can be said to exist where it appears that a public official’s private interests could improperly influence the performance of their duties, but this is not the case.
- A potential conflict of interest arises when a public official has private interests which are such that a conflict-of-interest situation would arise if the official were to become involved in relevant (i.e. conflicting) official responsibilities in the future.
Identifying a Private Interest
Private interests that could impact on a public official’s duties can include:
- Financial or pecuniary interests
- Personal affiliations and associations
- Family interests
- Private-capacity activity (such as ownership of a private business, participation on a Board of Directors, etc.)
- Previous relevant employment
Areas that present a higher risk of conflict of interest than others
Human Resource Management | Public Procurement | Other areas |
|
|
|
Examples of conflict-of-interest situations
Self-dealing | The official benefits by using their official capacity to conduct business with themselves in a private capacity — for example, giving a contract to a firm that they own |
Accepting benefits | The official accepts a benefit from a person they conduct official business with. |
Influence peddling | The official seeks a benefit in return for preferential treatment from a person they conduct official business with. |
Abusing government property | The official uses government property for private purposes |
Abusing confidential information | The official profits by using government information that is not available to the general public |
Outside employment impacting on public employment | The official works for additional remuneration at jobs outside government. For example, if the demands of the outside employment affect the time or energy devoted to the public position, a conflict arises |
Post public employment related to previous public positions held | The official uses information or contacts acquired while in a government position to benefit him- or herself, or others, after he/she leaves his public position |
Resolving a conflict-of-interest situation
When faced with an actual conflict of interest, public officials must disclose the conflict of interest. To avoid that a conflict-of-interest situation leads to corruption any private interests that might impact on their work should be disclosed. However, in some cases disclosure is not sufficient to resolve the conflict-of-interest and some additional steps are be necessary, such as:
- Divestment or liquidation of the conflicting interest
- Recusal from involvement in an affected decision-making process
- Restriction of access to particular information
- Transfer to a non-conflicting position
- Assignment of the conflicting interest in a genuinely “blind trust”
- Resignation
If a public official recuses himself or herself, it means that he or she will step away from any and every aspect of that issue. Recusal should include refraining from any of these actions:
- Voting
- Deciding
- Discussing
- Deliberating
- Recommending
- Reviewing
- Inspecting
- Investigating
- Any other action that could influence a decision
Key points to remember
- A conflict of interest occurs when a public official’s ability to be objective is impaired because of personal, family or business interest or beliefs
- A conflict of interest is common and is not automatically illegal, acting on the conflict of interest is illegal
- A conflict of interest can be resolved by either eliminating the conflicting interest or by recusing oneself from every aspect of the decision-making process relating to that particular situation